But in this case the allegation was he received the money from some other bank, in which he was not having any relationship. It is not the DA Case. Let us wait for some expert to give opinion on this issue.
From India, Kumbakonam
1165From India, Kumbakonam
The position of DA case was mentioned in regard to the previous general statement of onus of proof in criminal cases. The issue is mainly termination of queriest service on whatever grounds. In our country, the onus of proof should be governed by the following law:
The Bombay High Court in Mukund Staff And Officers' vs Mukund Ltd. In 2007 held as follows:
"16. Therefore, prima facie the burden lies upon the workmen to establish its claim as specific disputes have been raised against the order of termination and claimed reinstatement of full back wages and continuity of service."
From India, New Delhi
The Bombay High Court in Mukund Staff And Officers' vs Mukund Ltd. In 2007 held as follows:
"16. Therefore, prima facie the burden lies upon the workmen to establish its claim as specific disputes have been raised against the order of termination and claimed reinstatement of full back wages and continuity of service."
From India, New Delhi
Find answers from people who have previously dealt with business and work issues similar to yours - Please Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query.
Job Description - HR & Admin.doc
SKILLS YOU REQUIRE TO BAG THE JOB YOUWANT.pptx