No Tags Found!

SH

Shai89308

Executive Hr

AS

Ammu Shanvi

Human Resource

GS

G SHASHI KRISHNA

Senior Manager - Hr

AH

Aizant HR

Human Resources

MA

MARSHAL

Safety Officer

AK

Anish Katoch

Hr Executive

PR

PranjalR

Hr Recruiter

AP

Alka Pal

Hr Executive

Karthikeyan8195

Management Consultant

MK

Mohit Kumar Puri

Head Marketing

AU

Austex

Accounts Manager


ashok.jangra
36

very bad news i think our govt. think only for earn they shoul come in service filed not only earning. every perrson know how treat worker in the dispensary and how many formalities for treatment
Ashok

From India, New Delhi
annukalpana
1

Yes, we should fight on this, most of the employees don't use ESIC services, then why shoul we pay ECI, here every employee whose salary is 15,000/- will have to suffer, if our salary is going into vain like this. Let us fight against Government in this case.
From India, Eluru
ramnathmsw1976
10

Dear Riya, plz refer chapter IV Sec 39 (1) of ESI Act 1948. so it depends upon your pakage whether it is Annual CTC or Gross Salary which is mentioned in ur appointed letter. regards, Ramnath
From India, Bangalore
madhuraparab
12

Thanks all of you for your support for this unnessary changes by the Gov.Still the time is in our hand to make all the HR aware of it,& object the same by sending mail to sddotxavieratnicdotin
Last date for sending mail is 31 march 10.
Hurry up friends.

From India
P T George
I feel the Government should review the facilities provided by the ESI Corpoaration before implementing the revision of limit for coverage. The arbitrary decision of the Government should not lead to looting the employees and employers by collecting the subscription. The ESI is not providing for accidents happening outside the factory as in the past for injury arising out of employment. Hence the employers or employees will have to make additional insurance for such accidents. This is additional burden. Why not limit the subscription to the current level even when the coverage limit isd enhanced?
P T George

From Singapore, Singapore
raomadhusudanr
I feel it is one more way for Government to extract funds from people. The utilization factor for ESIC usage is very low added with plenty of corruption charges. Government should decentralize the health care and ensure their implementation efficiency towards whatever population it is being covered.
From India, Bangalore
akarshan
5

RIYA ... you need to go and kick ass of your HR department who have implemented CTC, this majorly makes the employee to pay for everything and allows the employer to only make money from his employee...
HR are humans too...guess they just love to make others suffer...

From India, Mumbai
Kuljit Pal Singh
21

Dear Friends, There is a provision in ESIC Act that in case the organisation is providing better healthcare and insurance of employees, the organisation may get exemption from ESIC. Regards
From India, Vadodara
panchapakesan
I do agree that the present ceiling on ESI coverage should not be raised. When it was raised earlier many Unions went to Courts.A workman or his family member falling ill is required to spend money to travel to ESI dispensary.He will be quite content in spending this money by consulting a Medical officer living in his area.Insurance sector is opening up.Pvt.insurance companies could be encouraged to provide better medical care through its innovative schemes.
From India, Bangalore
ramithrd.gtgroup@gmail.com
Hi,
Well I dont think that this amendment will be beneficial for employees. I have seen that a person whose salary become above than 10,000 after appraisal comes to us and say that he/she is happy because of there will be no deduction of ESIC anymore after the cycle. Before raising this limit Govt. should improve the facilities at Despenceries or hospitals as most of people are not availing the benefits of it.

From India, Jaipur
Find answers from people who have previously dealt with business and work issues similar to yours - Please Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query.





About Us Advertise Contact Us Testimonials
Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2024 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.