Hi HR's, I have one query form all the HR Personnel, kindly solve this query or Case Study.
A person who is intelligent getting admission in a very good college and get a placement with a package of Rs.12,000,00 PA and on the other hand a person who is more intelligent than the first person but get admission in an average college in his own home city due to location problem or health issue or some other genuine reason.
He gets consistently good marks in that college where placement activities are of average. He is financially weak.
In his last sem. he hardens the neck and moves to NCR for java training and during that period he started searching a job and faced interviews and he finally got the job.
Initially, he appointed as a Trainee with a package of Rs. 5000 PM. The company was a renowned MNC. Then after Six months 7000/- PM than after completing one year, he started his career with the same company with a package of 2.15 Lac. PA. as a permanent employee of the company. After getting an experience of 2 years he switches to another company with a package of Rs. 3.50 LAC PA.
AFTER 2 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE HIS SALARY IS RS. 3.50 LAC. PER ANNUM and where on the other hand "First-person" who is in a good college, intelligence level is the same of both the guys, get a package of Rs. 12,000,00 Lac. PA. as fresher level.
Can you tell me what the main idea of company people? Why they go for a good or u can say the best college, why not for hard work or intelligence.
why company people always offer a handsome package to those who are in a good college although fresher.
DON'T YOU THINK BOTH ARE ELIGIBLE FOR GOOD PACKAGE.
How the second person can get good opportunities as he is hardworking, intelligent, and deserving.
From India, Gurgaon
37A person who is intelligent getting admission in a very good college and get a placement with a package of Rs.12,000,00 PA and on the other hand a person who is more intelligent than the first person but get admission in an average college in his own home city due to location problem or health issue or some other genuine reason.
He gets consistently good marks in that college where placement activities are of average. He is financially weak.
In his last sem. he hardens the neck and moves to NCR for java training and during that period he started searching a job and faced interviews and he finally got the job.
Initially, he appointed as a Trainee with a package of Rs. 5000 PM. The company was a renowned MNC. Then after Six months 7000/- PM than after completing one year, he started his career with the same company with a package of 2.15 Lac. PA. as a permanent employee of the company. After getting an experience of 2 years he switches to another company with a package of Rs. 3.50 LAC PA.
AFTER 2 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE HIS SALARY IS RS. 3.50 LAC. PER ANNUM and where on the other hand "First-person" who is in a good college, intelligence level is the same of both the guys, get a package of Rs. 12,000,00 Lac. PA. as fresher level.
Can you tell me what the main idea of company people? Why they go for a good or u can say the best college, why not for hard work or intelligence.
why company people always offer a handsome package to those who are in a good college although fresher.
DON'T YOU THINK BOTH ARE ELIGIBLE FOR GOOD PACKAGE.
How the second person can get good opportunities as he is hardworking, intelligent, and deserving.
From India, Gurgaon
M/s Shweta,
It is a well known fact that the candidates who do a less demanded course in a reputed college shall get very good employment offer whereas the candidates who do highly demanded course in unpopular colleges may have to run to pillar to post to get an offer. This would be the case in getting compensation also. Your arguement may be correct in case of retaining the candidates especially from the unpopular colleges.
Proving the talent and job hopping are the only solution to get a higher compensation at a shorter period.
From India, Tiruppur
It is a well known fact that the candidates who do a less demanded course in a reputed college shall get very good employment offer whereas the candidates who do highly demanded course in unpopular colleges may have to run to pillar to post to get an offer. This would be the case in getting compensation also. Your arguement may be correct in case of retaining the candidates especially from the unpopular colleges.
Proving the talent and job hopping are the only solution to get a higher compensation at a shorter period.
From India, Tiruppur
Thanks for the reply, but both are with the same specialization.
But thing is a person with an experience of 2 years and on the other hand a person with no experience get a placement of Rs. 12,000,00/- and both are equal intelligent.
Just because there is a difference in the level of institution, Other person starts his career with Rs. 5,000 PM as Trainee he got praised for his performance by his Project Manager and become permanent employee with a package of 2.15 Lac. now after 2 years of experience he switch to other company with a package of 3.50 Lac only and this package commonly offered by organization to freshers during placement session.
Experience is much considerable or knowledge and if both... than ...
Don't you thing this is bias behavior of organizations.
From India, Gurgaon
But thing is a person with an experience of 2 years and on the other hand a person with no experience get a placement of Rs. 12,000,00/- and both are equal intelligent.
Just because there is a difference in the level of institution, Other person starts his career with Rs. 5,000 PM as Trainee he got praised for his performance by his Project Manager and become permanent employee with a package of 2.15 Lac. now after 2 years of experience he switch to other company with a package of 3.50 Lac only and this package commonly offered by organization to freshers during placement session.
Experience is much considerable or knowledge and if both... than ...
Don't you thing this is bias behavior of organizations.
From India, Gurgaon
its called banding my dear..talent can only be shown after getting assignment but to get assignment you’ve to be a brand name/ brand associated
From India, Delhi
From India, Delhi
I am surprised that a Brand Name can create a difference of 8.50 Lac. and too when there is a difference of experience...
From India, Gurgaon
From India, Gurgaon
yes my dear.. brand can create difference.. at some point we all are brand conscious.. its human psyche
From India, Delhi
From India, Delhi
But sir, What will they do with branded institution.
I think at the end of the day it is PERFORMANCE that matters and took an organization to the other way.
It is a matter that demotivates a person.
As an HR I am not in a favor of this bias behavior.
From India, Gurgaon
I think at the end of the day it is PERFORMANCE that matters and took an organization to the other way.
It is a matter that demotivates a person.
As an HR I am not in a favor of this bias behavior.
From India, Gurgaon
you may count your personal opinion but as professional level every one wants to hire cream.. and they are ready to pay for it, at end of day performance certainly count.. but to get evaluated you need to get into system for evaluation, for a simple example one will buy 35k galaxy SIII but they will not buy 12000 Micromax with same feature.. so its brand which puts you two step ahead in race.. some starts from zero and some from +10..
From India, Delhi
From India, Delhi
Ok than why Some good organization put job advertisement with relevant experience, say 2-4, 4-8.
Why they don't go for freshers.
What is the need of Management department where there are Managers, Sr. Managers having 5,8,10 or more Years of experience if they are OK with freshers.
Remember Status Become with Good performance, Quality work force NOT WITH BRAND.
Samsung was not a Good Brand when it entered but after attaining the experience of Mobile market they come with different ideas and beat Nokia. They analysed what a customer demand.
People like if they get something different. Micromax on the other hand has nothing new. So people have faith on Samsung.
But here the picture is different. Here Other person has different quality as he has 2 years of experience.
At the time of job posting they set criteria that " person should be with minimum ......years of experience".
Why????? if they are ok with freshers.
From India, Gurgaon
Why they don't go for freshers.
What is the need of Management department where there are Managers, Sr. Managers having 5,8,10 or more Years of experience if they are OK with freshers.
Remember Status Become with Good performance, Quality work force NOT WITH BRAND.
Samsung was not a Good Brand when it entered but after attaining the experience of Mobile market they come with different ideas and beat Nokia. They analysed what a customer demand.
People like if they get something different. Micromax on the other hand has nothing new. So people have faith on Samsung.
But here the picture is different. Here Other person has different quality as he has 2 years of experience.
At the time of job posting they set criteria that " person should be with minimum ......years of experience".
Why????? if they are ok with freshers.
From India, Gurgaon
experience gives you exposure/skill for andling complex issue.. it has nothing to do with money...let me tell you few factors for job satisfaction which i'd found during my MBA winter project, these are
1- your boss
2- your work environment
3- your colleague
4- growth/learning
5- money
so money is a factor but you cant say 12 lac package is every thing, its sometime luck.
and its not talent vs talent it talent vs attitude
a top b school teaches you nothing super than other schools but they gives you right attitude, its your attitude which makes you successful, sachin and kambli both were same talented but after one hurdle it was sachin's attitude which leads him..(an example from harsha bhogle's speech at IIT)
From India, Delhi
1- your boss
2- your work environment
3- your colleague
4- growth/learning
5- money
so money is a factor but you cant say 12 lac package is every thing, its sometime luck.
and its not talent vs talent it talent vs attitude
a top b school teaches you nothing super than other schools but they gives you right attitude, its your attitude which makes you successful, sachin and kambli both were same talented but after one hurdle it was sachin's attitude which leads him..(an example from harsha bhogle's speech at IIT)
From India, Delhi
Find answers from people who have previously dealt with business and work issues similar to yours - Please Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query.
Case Study on Promotion.pdf
Case study.doc