No Tags Found!

SH

Shai89308

Executive Hr

AS

Ammu Shanvi

Human Resource

GS

G SHASHI KRISHNA

Senior Manager - Hr

AH

Aizant HR

Human Resources

MA

MARSHAL

Safety Officer

AK

Anish Katoch

Hr Executive

PR

PranjalR

Hr Recruiter

AP

Alka Pal

Hr Executive

Karthikeyan8195

Management Consultant

MK

Mohit Kumar Puri

Head Marketing

AU

Austex

Accounts Manager


hetna-jethwa
I wanted to know, whether private schools are entitled to follow the new amendment of maternity benefit act 2017?
As per the act, A teacher working in a private school is liable to get 26 weeks maternity leave from the employer?
In the act its not mentioned clearly about schools.
Please provide information for the same.

From India
nathrao
3124

https://www.citehr.com/582114-matern...-download.html
From India, Pune
Madhu.T.K
3891

If you have at least ten employees, taking all the teaching and non teaching staff together, your school will come under the purview of Maternity Benefit Act. As such women employees having worked for 80 days in the 12 months preceding the expected date of delivery should be given 26 weeks leave with pay and medical bonus of Rs 3500.
From India, Kannur
jpratap
30

Many of the schools are covered under ESI Act, 1948. In such cases, Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 is not applicable. Please check.
From India, Chandigarh
Madhu.T.K
3891

Just because a school is covered under ESI Act, how can you say that maternity Benefit Act is not applicable. It should be like,Maternity Benefit Act is applicable to schools and in respect of employees including teachers who are under the ESI (only those who get salary of Rs 21000 or less will be under ESI) the liability of paying 26 weeks salary and medical bonus, as applicable, will be taken care by the ESI Corporation.
From India, Kannur
jpratap
30

Dear Mr. Madhu,
A short reply does not mean it is wrong. It is obvious that other conditions like 10 employees etc. should also be fulfilled. All such conditions are already there in the replies by other members.
Regards

From India, Chandigarh
Madhu.T.K
3891

Only myself had commented on the issue other than you. If you read what I had written, I had meant to say that the Maternity Benefit Act is applicable in the first instance and then only comes whose liability is it to provide maternity facility. Please read and then react.
From India, Kannur
Find answers from people who have previously dealt with business and work issues similar to yours - Please Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query.




About Us Advertise Contact Us Testimonials
Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2024 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.