Warning: preg_replace(): Empty regular expression in [path]/showthread.php on line 2381

Warning: preg_replace(): Empty regular expression in [path]/showthread.php on line 2381

Warning: preg_replace(): Empty regular expression in [path]/showthread.php on line 2381
Can any one explain which settlement (18(1) or 12(3)) is best for Employer as well as Union (wage settlement under ID Act'1947) - CiteHR

No Tags Found!

SH

Shai89308

Executive Hr

AS

Ammu Shanvi

Human Resource

GS

G SHASHI KRISHNA

Senior Manager - Hr

AH

Aizant HR

Human Resources

MA

MARSHAL

Safety Officer

AK

Anish Katoch

Hr Executive

PR

PranjalR

Hr Recruiter

AP

Alka Pal

Hr Executive

Karthikeyan8195

Management Consultant

MK

Mohit Kumar Puri

Head Marketing

AU

Austex

Accounts Manager


adprasadak
Dear Sirs,
Please explain that which settlement is best for Employer and which settlement is best for Union under Industrial Dispute Act'1947 either 18(1) - Bipartite or 12(3) - Tripartite) and why.
With regards
AK

From India, Hyderabad
Nagarkar Vinayak L
617

Dear Colleague,
It is tripartite ,12 (3) settlement is always better for both .It is iron clad, binding on both the parties, and no dispute on the matters covered by it for the period of settlement can be raised.
Regards,
Vinayak Nagarkar
HR- Consultant

From India, Mumbai
Babu Alexander
294

Settlement under Section 18(1) will only be binding only between the parties who signed the the settlement .
Wheres the settlement under section 12(3), before the Conciliation officer, will have a legal binding for all the employees of the organisation as mentioned in the settlement, for the period mentioned in the settlement
Both are legally correct. Which one is required to be decided, depending up on the situations / conditions and parties to the settlement.

From India, Madras
bijay_majumdar
357

Pls refer the link here on cite hr.it may help.
https://www.citehr.com/439684-re-id-...-3-18-3-a.html

From India, Vadodara
PRABHAT RANJAN MOHANTY
535

Dear Colleague,
In normal manner bipartite settlement is always good for industry and proves better cohesiveness.
The tripartite settlement comes to picture when bipartite settlement fails and matter goes to labour department for a settlement. The agreement is signed between three i.e. Employer, Union and Conciliation Officer.

From India, Mumbai
ravindranath anegondi
2

Settlements under 12(3) done through the conciliation of the labour officer/commissioner is always better. Normally you will not have any disputes.
From India, Chennai
Find answers from people who have previously dealt with business and work issues similar to yours - Please Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query.




About Us Advertise Contact Us Testimonials
Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2024 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.