No Tags Found!

SH

Shai89308

Executive Hr

AS

Ammu Shanvi

Human Resource

GS

G SHASHI KRISHNA

Senior Manager - Hr

AH

Aizant HR

Human Resources

MA

MARSHAL

Safety Officer

AK

Anish Katoch

Hr Executive

PR

PranjalR

Hr Recruiter

AP

Alka Pal

Hr Executive

Karthikeyan8195

Management Consultant

MK

Mohit Kumar Puri

Head Marketing

AU

Austex

Accounts Manager


V.B.Patil
50

As per my understanding if the principal employer is having 15 employees then PF is not applicable.
If, the principal employer who is having 15 on role employees appoints 25 contract employees as per contract labour act, then ultimately PF is applicable to contract employees as strength is more than 20.
My Query:
.
In the above case -
Does the PF applicable to company whose strength is only 15?
Your help in this regard will be highly appreciated.
Waiting for seniors guidance.
Regards
Vinayak
.

From India, Kolhapur
vishram18
52

Hi Vinayak, If that contractor having his own PF code ?? if it is so then, tell that contractor to pay PF for contractual workers..
From India, Bombay
Apex Management
156

Dear Vinayak,
Please note that in case the total number of employees employed in any establishment including contractual, is 20 or more, the provisions of the EPF are applicable on that establishment.
As far as compliance is concerned, if the contractor is independently covered under the EPF act, he has to make compliance in his code in respect of his employees and the establishment has to deposit their own dues.
P K Sharma

From India, Delhi
Supriyamd
14

Mr. Vinayak,
Our Company has only 3 employees on Roll and 300 employees on Contract. On Roll employees are not entitled to any Statutory benefits, whereas Contract employees are paid with ESI, PF and PT. So I also have same doubt and waiting for expert opinion.

From India, Bengaluru
Apex Management
156

Supriyamd........ You are clearly violating the various labour laws if company employees are being deprived from the benefits. P K sharma
From India, Delhi
Carmel David
@apex management. Has the no. 20 not amended to 10 recently. Please confirm. I think this amendment is applicable since April 2016. If yes, please share the notification or the link to it. Thank you!
From India, Bengaluru
Apex Management
156

Mr. Carmel David,
While calculating number of persons employed, all categories of employment whether directly or indirectly are considered and as such question of coverage on 10 instead of 20 for EPF does not arise as in one case direct employee 15 + contract employees 25 total 40 and in second direct employees 3 and contract employees 300 total 303.
P K Sharma

From India, Delhi
Supriyamd
14

Apex Management,
I am also one of the employee, I am not entitled for pf or esi. That is the reason i asked for.
I should enquire my employer too on this issue. Thanks for en-lighting me on this issue.

From India, Bengaluru
Find answers from people who have previously dealt with business and work issues similar to yours - Please Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query.




About Us Advertise Contact Us Testimonials
Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2025 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.