No Tags Found!

SH

Shai89308

Executive Hr

AS

Ammu Shanvi

Human Resource

GS

G SHASHI KRISHNA

Senior Manager - Hr

AH

Aizant HR

Human Resources

MA

MARSHAL

Safety Officer

AK

Anish Katoch

Hr Executive

PR

PranjalR

Hr Recruiter

AP

Alka Pal

Hr Executive

Karthikeyan8195

Management Consultant

MK

Mohit Kumar Puri

Head Marketing

AU

Austex

Accounts Manager


devgahlot
Respected members...
Presently i m working in sales department of my company. At the time of joining i filled a service contract, which has a clause of bond to work for min. Of 2 years for the company against which some portion of my salary is also deducted each month. After completion of 2 years service it will be refunded to me.
Now my 2 years of job is completed and i m looking for some job change in my competitors company. By now i came to know that service contract also has a clause..i.e. You will not join directly or indirectly join to any of competitors company for 2 years from the date of leaving of my present company...
I thick this is very much rude../unfair..
I request you all to provide me some guidance in this matter..that whether i can change my job or not...
Awaiting for your valuable suggestions...

From India, Bikaner
pon1965
604

These are all standard clauses. A person working in a particular sector, will join in the same sectors only. Go ahead with your plan. Pon
From India, Lucknow
tushar.swar
206

Dear All,
these are the standerd clauses for the confidentiality of company business, these are the written terms & conditions, which belive that, you must have read, understand & then accepted only.
Its some kind of contract its self between two parties, you should have think before sign such T & C..
Regards,
Tushar Swar

From India, Mumbai
saquibshaikh
12

Dear Dev Please find SC Judgement on your issue. Regards, Saquib
From India
Attached Files (Download Requires Membership)
File Type: pdf Pepsi_Foods_Ltd[1]._And_Others_vs_Bharat_Coca-Cola_Holdings_Pvt._..._on_30_July,_1999.pdf (165.3 KB, 127 views)

pon1965
604

Thanks for posting SC judgement.
Good point by the judge
"It is well settled that such post termination restraint, under Indian Law, is in violation of
Section 27 of the Contract Act. Such contracts are unenforceable, void and against the public policy. What is
prohibited by law cannot be permitted by Court's injunction."
Pon

From India, Lucknow
Find answers from people who have previously dealt with business and work issues similar to yours - Please Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query.




About Us Advertise Contact Us Testimonials
Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2024 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.