Warning: preg_match(): Unknown modifier 'c' in [path]/showthread.php on line 2297

Warning: preg_match(): Unknown modifier 'c' in [path]/showthread.php on line 2298
PMS Using Bell Curve - CiteHR

No Tags Found!

SH

Shai89308

Executive Hr

AS

Ammu Shanvi

Human Resource

GS

G SHASHI KRISHNA

Senior Manager - Hr

AH

Aizant HR

Human Resources

MA

MARSHAL

Safety Officer

AK

Anish Katoch

Hr Executive

PR

PranjalR

Hr Recruiter

AP

Alka Pal

Hr Executive

Karthikeyan8195

Management Consultant

MK

Mohit Kumar Puri

Head Marketing

AU

Austex

Accounts Manager


piyushmisra
Hi Community, :P
I'm working with a healthcare management compnay, having experience of four years.
Please give me some inputs on Performance Management System using Belll Curve. :?:
Is there is any article or PPt or book which can help me on this
Regards,
PIYUSH

From India, Delhi
pranati
49

<link no longer exists - removed>

visit the following link on our website only

Many organizations today use a bell-curve for performance evaluation process. They reward a small percentage of top performers, encourage a large majority in the middle to improve,and lay-off the bottom performers. Companies believe that such pay-for-performance

system encourages employees to perform better. The question we explore in this paper is:does the system increase the overall performance of the company over time?We observe that pressure, if maintained below a certain level, can lead to higherperformance. However, with lay-offs, constant pressure demoralizes employees, leading to

drop in performance. As the company shrinks, the rigid distribution of bell-curve forcesmanagers to label a high performer as a mediocre. A high performer, unmotivated by suchartificial demotion, behaves like a mediocre. Further, managers begin to reward visible

performance over the actual. Finally, the erosion of social capital could cripple the company.We recommend the use of a semi-bell-curve where someone who performs like a toperformer is rewarded as one. Further, we recommend balancing pressure and morale. We

recognize that such a balance is very difficult to strike, and can be successfully achieved onlyby decoupling the issue of lay-offs from the performance evaluation process, to some extent.

From India, Mumbai
pranati
49

<link no longer exists - removed>

visit the following link on our website only

Many organizations today use a bell-curve for performance evaluation process. They reward a small percentage of top performers, encourage a large majority in the middle to improve,and lay-off the bottom performers. Companies believe that such pay-for-performance

system encourages employees to perform better. The question we explore in this paper is:does the system increase the overall performance of the company over time?We observe that pressure, if maintained below a certain level, can lead to higherperformance. However, with lay-offs, constant pressure demoralizes employees, leading to

drop in performance. As the company shrinks, the rigid distribution of bell-curve forcesmanagers to label a high performer as a mediocre. A high performer, unmotivated by suchartificial demotion, behaves like a mediocre. Further, managers begin to reward visible

performance over the actual. Finally, the erosion of social capital could cripple the company.We recommend the use of a semi-bell-curve where someone who performs like a toperformer is rewarded as one. Further, we recommend balancing pressure and morale. We

recognize that such a balance is very difficult to strike, and can be successfully achieved onlyby decoupling the issue of lay-offs from the performance evaluation process, to some extent.

From India, Mumbai
Find answers from people who have previously dealt with business and work issues similar to yours - Please Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query.




About Us Advertise Contact Us Testimonials
Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2024 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.