Once they are in to rolls how can u control them not to be jr. and sr. tp each other. This is something which is not practically possible.
Great writeup Rebel HR guys here might not have given consideration to this issue yet. But, this is going to be a biggest hurdle for them in immediate future. Wake up guys
This false case is crystal clear. Let me enumerate the sequence.
1) Tripti physically and emotionally tortured her husband Gaurav because she wanted the house and the car in her own name. Gaurav didn't react.
2) Tripti filed a false dowry harassment case on Gaurav and her in-laws. Gaurav, his mother and sister were arrested. They got bail later.
3) Tripti knew the Gaurav is still not reacting because he is earning good in a reputed company. The lawyer told Tripti, "If Gaurav realises that his employment is in danger, than he will agree to your terms."
4) Tripti consulted her lawyer and came up with a new idea. Accusing her husband of adultery or office romance To get maximum mileage to her case, she thought, why not drag Azim Premji into the DV act net.
5) Tripti said that she met the company people to talk about Gaurav's behaviour, and she said the company dismissed her complaint. It is still not known whether she actually went and met them or just fooling around. There is no statement from Wipro on this.
6) Tripti, on the suggestion of her lawyer, files a DV act on her husband and Azim Premji for having dating allowance which led to her marriage problem.
7) Tripti didn't realise that there is no dating allowance in Wipro.
8) Tripti also didn't realise that there are few organisations that will come forward and give an opportunity to Gaurav to express his side of the story.
9) Gaurav reveals the truth and exposes Tripti's plan.
10) Tripti is now desparate to recover her lost ground. She wants Gaurav back in her life for their child.
11) Gaurav was falsely implicated under 498A with a false complaint of his wife, and now also she tried to ruin his career using DV Act. After so much legal torture, who would want to live with this kind of woman?
12) However, it is important to note that after divorce, Gaurav will have to comply by the CrPC 125 maintenance provision. He will have to pay maintenance, alimony to Tripti who tried to ruin his life and his career.
One needs to understand that DV Act is supposed to protect actual victims of domestic violence. Victims could be a male or a female. Why DV Act does not protect male victims?
Supreme Court says that 498A is misused to a such an extent that out of 100 cases, 98 cases are false.
DV Act is so dangerous that only because Azim Premji's name was dragged and the truth was revealed by the press, too, that we came to know about how DV act can be misused.
But there will be hundreds, maybe thousands of cases happening right now at this very moment where the wife has already started threatening their husband and in-laws with legal consequence using DV Act if her wishes are not fulfilled. It is really sad. Supreme Court calls this as Legal Terrorism. Who will help those innocent victims who are legally terrorized every single day by a woman using such draconian laws?
People working in the corporate world are men, too. They have their own life, and if their family life is destroyed with biased laws like 498A and DV Act, then it is everybody's concern. Will it not affect the country's economy if families break?
This malpractice will not stop if people don't oppose it.
From India, Mumbai
31) Tripti physically and emotionally tortured her husband Gaurav because she wanted the house and the car in her own name. Gaurav didn't react.
2) Tripti filed a false dowry harassment case on Gaurav and her in-laws. Gaurav, his mother and sister were arrested. They got bail later.
3) Tripti knew the Gaurav is still not reacting because he is earning good in a reputed company. The lawyer told Tripti, "If Gaurav realises that his employment is in danger, than he will agree to your terms."
4) Tripti consulted her lawyer and came up with a new idea. Accusing her husband of adultery or office romance To get maximum mileage to her case, she thought, why not drag Azim Premji into the DV act net.
5) Tripti said that she met the company people to talk about Gaurav's behaviour, and she said the company dismissed her complaint. It is still not known whether she actually went and met them or just fooling around. There is no statement from Wipro on this.
6) Tripti, on the suggestion of her lawyer, files a DV act on her husband and Azim Premji for having dating allowance which led to her marriage problem.
7) Tripti didn't realise that there is no dating allowance in Wipro.
8) Tripti also didn't realise that there are few organisations that will come forward and give an opportunity to Gaurav to express his side of the story.
9) Gaurav reveals the truth and exposes Tripti's plan.
10) Tripti is now desparate to recover her lost ground. She wants Gaurav back in her life for their child.
11) Gaurav was falsely implicated under 498A with a false complaint of his wife, and now also she tried to ruin his career using DV Act. After so much legal torture, who would want to live with this kind of woman?
12) However, it is important to note that after divorce, Gaurav will have to comply by the CrPC 125 maintenance provision. He will have to pay maintenance, alimony to Tripti who tried to ruin his life and his career.
One needs to understand that DV Act is supposed to protect actual victims of domestic violence. Victims could be a male or a female. Why DV Act does not protect male victims?
Supreme Court says that 498A is misused to a such an extent that out of 100 cases, 98 cases are false.
DV Act is so dangerous that only because Azim Premji's name was dragged and the truth was revealed by the press, too, that we came to know about how DV act can be misused.
But there will be hundreds, maybe thousands of cases happening right now at this very moment where the wife has already started threatening their husband and in-laws with legal consequence using DV Act if her wishes are not fulfilled. It is really sad. Supreme Court calls this as Legal Terrorism. Who will help those innocent victims who are legally terrorized every single day by a woman using such draconian laws?
People working in the corporate world are men, too. They have their own life, and if their family life is destroyed with biased laws like 498A and DV Act, then it is everybody's concern. Will it not affect the country's economy if families break?
This malpractice will not stop if people don't oppose it.
From India, Mumbai
"12) However, it is important to note that after divorce, Gaurav will have to comply by the CrPC 125 maintenance provision. He will have to pay maintenance, alimony to Tripti who tried to ruin his life and his career"
I do not think Gaurav is to pay u/s 125 Cr.P.C. even. For Tripti the hurdles are:
1. Does she has sufficient means to support herself?
2. Does she have just cause to remain separate?(subsection 4).
The same hurdles she will face with other claims as well.
regards
From India, Delhi
I do not think Gaurav is to pay u/s 125 Cr.P.C. even. For Tripti the hurdles are:
1. Does she has sufficient means to support herself?
2. Does she have just cause to remain separate?(subsection 4).
The same hurdles she will face with other claims as well.
regards
From India, Delhi
If some one is having affair or convinced to have is nothing to do with the companys policys to pay allowance. That is very personal life of every one.
Do you mean to say that Tripti Nigam’s allegations are false? Then what will happen if 90% of hundreds of cases under DV Act become false? regards
From India, Delhi
From India, Delhi
a) The company has DENIED paying a DATING allowance
http://www.indiaenews.com/business/20061123/29834.htm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6180224.stm
b) So This un scrupulous female MUST HAVE BEEN LYING about the daring allowance. The whole issue MUST have been MADE UP to add marsala to the story
c) This un scrupulous female MUST HAVE THOUGHT that ONLY HER views would be heard
d) she MAY NOT have known about the existence of Save Indian family - a saviour for harassed men
e) now that the counter view is OPEN TO THE WORLD one needs to see what the world does with this
BUT this case is an eye opener
This case shows that un scrupulous wives can stoop to any extent and even attack ICONs of the industry WITH FALSE statements !!!
The DV act will make India unsafe for married men !!!!
regards
vinayak
http://www.indiaenews.com/business/20061123/29834.htm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6180224.stm
b) So This un scrupulous female MUST HAVE BEEN LYING about the daring allowance. The whole issue MUST have been MADE UP to add marsala to the story
c) This un scrupulous female MUST HAVE THOUGHT that ONLY HER views would be heard
d) she MAY NOT have known about the existence of Save Indian family - a saviour for harassed men
e) now that the counter view is OPEN TO THE WORLD one needs to see what the world does with this
BUT this case is an eye opener
This case shows that un scrupulous wives can stoop to any extent and even attack ICONs of the industry WITH FALSE statements !!!
The DV act will make India unsafe for married men !!!!
regards
vinayak
Vinayak ji,
Let us focus more on the remification of DV Act on work place climate and industrial productivity. It is not the first and last case but there will be thousands of such cases of which as Sdhehswar guesses 90% percent will be false.
How the industries are going to cope with such a situation? Can knowledge of labour law or HRM acumen will be of any help?
regards
From India, Delhi
Let us focus more on the remification of DV Act on work place climate and industrial productivity. It is not the first and last case but there will be thousands of such cases of which as Sdhehswar guesses 90% percent will be false.
How the industries are going to cope with such a situation? Can knowledge of labour law or HRM acumen will be of any help?
regards
From India, Delhi
Dear Sid
Pls dont get so touchy abt Govinds remark. I think if we are here for open discussions we shld do so not getting personal. Govind has the right to say something...even he is a indian...
We can debate on the topic by giving better points like Dr Jogehswar is giving thats it.
Hope all the members wld be careful. Then only it wld be worth giving ur views.
Regards,
Asha
Pls dont get so touchy abt Govinds remark. I think if we are here for open discussions we shld do so not getting personal. Govind has the right to say something...even he is a indian...
We can debate on the topic by giving better points like Dr Jogehswar is giving thats it.
Hope all the members wld be careful. Then only it wld be worth giving ur views.
Regards,
Asha
Find answers from people who have previously dealt with business and work issues similar to yours - Please Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query.
1.Be a Better Boss and not a Bitter Boss.doc
Big-golf-hole_5 51.jpg