Hi, That’s true we have to say everything on same time so a candidate will be more clear rather then waiting for a call.We should have a transparent system. Carry on. :D
1
Hi Deepthi
U have raised a very important topic.. I was also thinking of the same since recruitments are going on in my organizations.. And I have got a important information on the issue of post interview.
Regards
Ratandeep Kaur
From India, Delhi
U have raised a very important topic.. I was also thinking of the same since recruitments are going on in my organizations.. And I have got a important information on the issue of post interview.
Regards
Ratandeep Kaur
From India, Delhi
Dear Deepti,
In fact there are few reasons behind this & few out of them are...
May be the candidate is so flustrated to giving the interviews continuously that,if you say directly to him/her that,he/she is not selected.In that case he/she can do any thing,He/She can take any dangerous discission.Also refusing directly would not be a manner.
I have few reasons to tel you,but coz of shortage of time,i could not write more.I will tell you later.
Regards,
Anil Tomar
From India, New Delhi
In fact there are few reasons behind this & few out of them are...
May be the candidate is so flustrated to giving the interviews continuously that,if you say directly to him/her that,he/she is not selected.In that case he/she can do any thing,He/She can take any dangerous discission.Also refusing directly would not be a manner.
I have few reasons to tel you,but coz of shortage of time,i could not write more.I will tell you later.
Regards,
Anil Tomar
From India, New Delhi
It hurts a lot for a candidate to hear that he is not selected, no one likes to hear NO, which is the general human nature. From the facial expressions of HR and by the tone in which the HR says "we will get back to u later". the candidate understands the hidden meaning, i.e he is not selected. But if tomorrow there is no candidate for the HR, he can always call back the candidate whom he told that we will get back to u later, and at this time the candidate if still searching will thank his stars. This situation creates a win win situation for the HR only, and not for the candidate.
You know what, I once gave a telephonic interview, and got a call for personal interview, after 3-4 months, this clearly gave me the idea that they must hav selected someone and he must hav left after 3-4 months so the next candidate i.e I was told that the opening is still open and I can attend the interview.
Here I very diplomatically increased my CTC, and told to attend interview I would need travelling expenses, since then I have not heard from them, probably they must be flabbergasted by my reply.
Best practice is after the finalisation , a letter needs to be sent to rejected candidates mentioning they are not fit for the job, or not found ok.
From India, Pune
You know what, I once gave a telephonic interview, and got a call for personal interview, after 3-4 months, this clearly gave me the idea that they must hav selected someone and he must hav left after 3-4 months so the next candidate i.e I was told that the opening is still open and I can attend the interview.
Here I very diplomatically increased my CTC, and told to attend interview I would need travelling expenses, since then I have not heard from them, probably they must be flabbergasted by my reply.
Best practice is after the finalisation , a letter needs to be sent to rejected candidates mentioning they are not fit for the job, or not found ok.
From India, Pune
Find answers from people who have previously dealt with business and work issues similar to yours - Please Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query.
Post Interview.ppt
The post-interview etiquette.pdf