No Tags Found!

SH

Shai89308

Executive Hr

AS

Ammu Shanvi

Human Resource

GS

G SHASHI KRISHNA

Senior Manager - Hr

AH

Aizant HR

Human Resources

MA

MARSHAL

Safety Officer

AK

Anish Katoch

Hr Executive

PR

PranjalR

Hr Recruiter

AP

Alka Pal

Hr Executive

Karthikeyan8195

Management Consultant

MK

Mohit Kumar Puri

Head Marketing

AU

Austex

Accounts Manager


jagadish347
4

Term in the letter of appointment of managers that service can be terminated by either side giving notice of one/three months.Validity of such term.
Can the term be used without following principles of natural justice.

From India, Pune
Dinesh Divekar
7736

Dear Jagadish,

We do not know in what context you have raised your query. A little more background information could have brought clarity.

If the company wishes to terminate the services of the employee on disciplinary grounds, then it is incumbent on the company to follow the principles of natural justice.

Yes, you may give short shrift to the disciplinary procedure, however, by chance, if the terminated employee files a lawsuit, then the company may get entangled in the litigation. As you are well aware that court cases drag on the for the years. Under such circumstances, the cost of the half job could be greater than the cost incurred because of the process of discipline.

If the company adheres to the principles of natural justice, then the company can have a sense of comfort or relief, and the other party will think many times before proceeding with the litigation.

Thanks,

Dinesh Divekar

From India, Bangalore
KK!HR
1422

In analysing the issue distinction has to be made between the public/Government sector and the Private Sector. As regards the public/Government sector such an action would be hit by Article 14 and Article 16(1) of the Constitution of India. In the case of Private Sector, again distinction between the workman category and others. As regards a person who is in workmen category as per the ID Act 1947, acquires a status on completion of 240 days of service and hence cannot be terminated using this clause. The termination of an employee who is not in the Supervisory/managerial cadre as per the Contract of Service mutually agreed between the employer and employee signifies a contract as per the Contract Act 1872 and is a valid and enforceable one. The Supreme Court in OP Bhandari Vs. ITDC (1987 AIR SC 111) has held that a Gold Collar employee can be discharged without questions being asked. In fact Justice Thakkar who authored the judgement called for such a regulation for the PSUs too at the highest level.
From India, Mumbai
jagadish347
4

In my opinion even in private sector even if a person is management staff,his service can not be terminated taking recourse to only the term in letter of appointment relating to termination requiring only notice of certain period.
That termination would be illegal because it would be in the nature of hire and fire.Secondly in service contracts an employee and employer do not have equal bargaining power and the employee has no option but to accept the terms.
There were two appeals in district court at pune on same ground and they went in favour of management staff.Noe the matter is before the High Court.

From India, Pune
Find answers from people who have previously dealt with business and work issues similar to yours - Please Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query.




About Us Advertise Contact Us Testimonials
Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2025 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.