Dear All
I find myself in a highly unexpected situation. Having a perfectly healthy pregnancy till 37 th week suddenly at the next regular check up the baby died in utero (IUFD) with no cause. I am now having a difference of opinion with my employer in respect of my maternity leave entitlement.
As per the law 'still born' child is also a child.
My doctors report says it's a delivery and not a miscarriage in natural delivery process through pain induction.
I believe I should be entitled to 26 weeks as per the recent ammendment. Please advise if my understanding is appropriate
Rgds
KJ
From India, Mumbai
I find myself in a highly unexpected situation. Having a perfectly healthy pregnancy till 37 th week suddenly at the next regular check up the baby died in utero (IUFD) with no cause. I am now having a difference of opinion with my employer in respect of my maternity leave entitlement.
As per the law 'still born' child is also a child.
My doctors report says it's a delivery and not a miscarriage in natural delivery process through pain induction.
I believe I should be entitled to 26 weeks as per the recent ammendment. Please advise if my understanding is appropriate
Rgds
KJ
From India, Mumbai
dear lady,
In case of your doctor certifying it is delivery and not miscarriage, you are fully entitled for the maternity leave and there is no question of curtailing by the authorities. Still born is also delivery and the consequences are different.
From India, Arcot
175In case of your doctor certifying it is delivery and not miscarriage, you are fully entitled for the maternity leave and there is no question of curtailing by the authorities. Still born is also delivery and the consequences are different.
From India, Arcot
Find answers from people who have previously dealt with business and work issues similar to yours - Please Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query.
Creche under Maternity Benefit Act.pdf
MATERNITY BENEFIT ACT 2009.doc