Dear Team,
Recently I have an objection with Labor commissioner regarding Facility Management Contract. I was appointed one primary contractor with and executed single service agreement for House keeping & security services.
1. The discussion point is the primary contractor not having PASARA license for security services, but sub contractor (Who actually rendered security services below the primary contractor) having PASARA license.
2. Any way we are having a clause in the service agreement that must engaged PASARA licenses vendor only under the primary contractor. The labor officer said that was illegal agreement. Is it correct.
3. Please suggest me.
Regards,
Naren
From India, Hyderabad
1Recently I have an objection with Labor commissioner regarding Facility Management Contract. I was appointed one primary contractor with and executed single service agreement for House keeping & security services.
1. The discussion point is the primary contractor not having PASARA license for security services, but sub contractor (Who actually rendered security services below the primary contractor) having PASARA license.
2. Any way we are having a clause in the service agreement that must engaged PASARA licenses vendor only under the primary contractor. The labor officer said that was illegal agreement. Is it correct.
3. Please suggest me.
Regards,
Naren
From India, Hyderabad
The ageeement between primary contractor and sub contractor where primary contractor is principal employer can be one possibility.However it is the facility where security is provided may be the issue as it is not the premises of primary contractor.
From India, Vadodara
From India, Vadodara
Find answers from people who have previously dealt with business and work issues similar to yours - Please Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query.
Contract Safety Management.pdf
Contract Labour Management.ppt
QUARRIES ON CONTRACT LABOUR MANAGEMENT.docx