No Tags Found!

SH

Shai89308

Executive Hr

AS

Ammu Shanvi

Human Resource

GS

G SHASHI KRISHNA

Senior Manager - Hr

AH

Aizant HR

Human Resources

MA

MARSHAL

Safety Officer

AK

Anish Katoch

Hr Executive

PR

PranjalR

Hr Recruiter

AP

Alka Pal

Hr Executive

Karthikeyan8195

Management Consultant

MK

Mohit Kumar Puri

Head Marketing

AU

Austex

Accounts Manager


Prashant B Ingawale
467

Dear Seniors, What is meant by Break in Service as per Gratuity Act? Do private organization can follow this ? Or only it is limited to Government Organization only? Thanks in advance.
From India, Pune
umakanthan53
5967

Dear Prashanth,
In the context of the Payment of Gratuity Act,1972, break in service refers to the period during which the continuity of the service of an employee stands snapped while still the contract of employment between the employer and the employee subsists. In other words, any period of interruptions in service other than those deemed to be non-interruptions u/s 2-A of the Act is a break in service of the employee for the purpose of gratuity.
Every establishment falling within the ambit of Sec.1(3) of the PGAct,1972 has to follow it irrespective of its sectoral classification.

From India, Salem
korgaonkar k a
2555

Dear Prashant ji,
While appreciating the reply by Umakanthan Sir to your query, I would just like to add as under.
The definition of 'Continuous Service' was introduced by insertion of an independent section 2-A by way of an amendment 1984 (effected from 1981) which was following the H'ble SC judgement in Lalappa Lingappa (1981 I LLJ 308) wherein it has been held (1) that the permanent employees were not entitled to payment of Gratuity for the years they remained absent without leave and had actually worked for less than 240 days in a year and (2) that the badli employees were not covered by substantive part but come with in the then existing explanation 'I' and therefore not entitled to payment of Gratuity for the badli period i.e. in respect of years in which no work was allotted to them due to their failure to report to duty. To ameliorate the hardship arising out of the ruling of H'ble SC and confer the right of payment of Gratuity to badli workers and others who work for 240 days or more in a year / years, the Parliament re-enacted the definition of 'Continuous Service' vide independent section 2-A.

From India, Mumbai
Madhu.T.K
3891

In continuation to what Umakanthan Sir and Korgaonkarji have said I would also like to add that in respect of employees of establishments which work 5 days in a week, the minimum number of days for continuous service is 190. This applies to employees employed below the ground of a mine also even if the mine works for 6 days a week. Moreover, this 240/ 190 days, as the case may be, is inclusive of all paid holidays, weekly off days, leave days and even the days on which the employee was on leave without pay following any employment injury. Please note that we will not pay wages in respect of an employee covered by ESI when he takes leave on account of accident, but these days will not interrupt his service. At the same time any loss of pay leave which is not regularised later on even as LOP days will be treated as interruption of service. The same was also discussed in the Lalappa case above mentioned.
Madhu T K

From India, Kannur
vikask87
Dear Sirs,
With regard to above topics, just need your thoughts in below.
I had worked for ABC company for one year and resigned and joined XYZ company and again come back worked with ABC company for four years. Now I have worked for total five years am I entitle for gratuity or not.

From India, New Delhi
Madhu.T.K
3891

Your date of rejoining the service is the date of joining and the present service cannot be claimed as in continuation to your previous service. When you rejoined the service you should have got a new appointment order and it is based on that you have joined the company in your second spell and as such there is no scope of clubbing the previous service. It is possible if the HR had done any mistake due to ignorance. If that is the case I will not advise you that you should take advantage of that poor fellow who had allowed you to rejoin when you were in search of a job after you found that the company that your joined does not match your expectations.
Madhu T K

From India, Kannur
Find answers from people who have previously dealt with business and work issues similar to yours - Please Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query.




About Us Advertise Contact Us Testimonials
Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2024 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.