Warning: preg_replace(): Empty regular expression in [path]/showthread.php on line 2381

Warning: preg_replace(): Empty regular expression in [path]/showthread.php on line 2381

Warning: preg_replace(): Empty regular expression in [path]/showthread.php on line 2381
who is authorised or legal Performance reviewer - CiteHR

No Tags Found!

SH

Shai89308

Executive Hr

AS

Ammu Shanvi

Human Resource

GS

G SHASHI KRISHNA

Senior Manager - Hr

AH

Aizant HR

Human Resources

MA

MARSHAL

Safety Officer

AK

Anish Katoch

Hr Executive

PR

PranjalR

Hr Recruiter

AP

Alka Pal

Hr Executive

Karthikeyan8195

Management Consultant

MK

Mohit Kumar Puri

Head Marketing

AU

Austex

Accounts Manager


srirashmi.dm
Hi,
Please share me details incase if a employee has 2 or more supervisor consider as one sits in India with him & is approval manager & other sits in other states who will assign work.
Please let me no who is authorised to do the review legally or if any policy related to this pls share me.
Thanks in Advance
sri

From India, Hyderabad
Dinesh Divekar
7736

Dear Srirashmi,
Many times, because of the nature of the work, need for dual reporting arises. Most of the time one is functional reporting and another Admin one.
Imagine a situation wherein Head SCM of India operations reports to the Global Head of SCM. In such a case, Global Head will design the KRAs, issue work-related guidelines, will ensure that the work related to supplier selection or delivery of the material etc is as per the SOP.
On the another side, there could be another person heading for India Operations. Head SCM of India operations needs to report to him also. While he may not give directions related to purchase function but he will control basic requirements like leave, attendance etc. He might give guidelines to Head SCM of India Operations about the upcoming projects, local requirements if any, etc.
Dual reporting happens in MNCs for Finance, Customer Service, HR and so on.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar

From India, Bangalore
srirashmi.dm
Dear Dinesh,
Thanks for the info. Yes scenario is more r less the same what u explained. I need to know who can do the review is the functional manager or team manager or both with mutual agreement. Is any policy in india which explain about the eligibility if reviewer.
sri

From India, Hyderabad
Nileshcb
11

In this case, the territory boss will reivew it first and put his suggestion for consideration, final recommendation shall come from the functional boss, who seats in HQ.
From India, Mumbai
Dinesh Divekar
7736

Dear Srirashmi,
It is better if both the bosses decide on the KRAs of their reportee. Functional KRAs may be decided by the functional head and Admin reporting authority may decide about the requirement of local KRAs, if any. Nevertheless, it is important to consider that local authority allots work where the junior spends time but the consumption of his time does not get accounted.
Sometimes, managing two bosses is traumatic. Therefore, it is important to ensure that the junior does not get pulled apart in fulfilling expectations of both.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar

From India, Bangalore
Find answers from people who have previously dealt with business and work issues similar to yours - Please Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query.




About Us Advertise Contact Us Testimonials
Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2024 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.