Warning: preg_replace(): Empty regular expression in [path]/showthread.php on line 2381

Warning: preg_replace(): Empty regular expression in [path]/showthread.php on line 2381

Warning: preg_replace(): Empty regular expression in [path]/showthread.php on line 2381
Labour Law termination issue - unauthorised leave of 4 days - CiteHR

No Tags Found!

SH

Shai89308

Executive Hr

AS

Ammu Shanvi

Human Resource

GS

G SHASHI KRISHNA

Senior Manager - Hr

AH

Aizant HR

Human Resources

MA

MARSHAL

Safety Officer

AK

Anish Katoch

Hr Executive

PR

PranjalR

Hr Recruiter

AP

Alka Pal

Hr Executive

Karthikeyan8195

Management Consultant

MK

Mohit Kumar Puri

Head Marketing

AU

Austex

Accounts Manager


krishna@kk
Dear All, Pl suggest one of college was terminated from Noida under unauthorised leave of 4 days . Company terminate on the spot and denied to pay any notice period amount without any domestic inquiry. Strange thing is that Noida Labour office inspector says that I have intimated to matter to your company now you can go to suit a case in civil. The inspector did not enquiry at all, no notice was sent to company, not a single hearing is done till the date. its almost 3 months passed nothing has happened.
Pl suggest next course of action as no one is ready to help in this case in labour court. Should we move civil court or can we take some action against inspector.

From India, New Delhi
umakanthan53
5967

Straight dismissal for an unauthorised absence of 4 days is certainly a disproportionate punishment whether the delinquent is a workman under the ID Act,1947 or not. However, the recourse to remedy differs accordingly. You could have mentioned the post and its position held by your former collegue. Ex facie, the Labor Officer's suggestion may be based on the fact that your friend was employed in supervisory capacity with a salary more than Rs.10000/= p.m or in managerial cadre. In that case his suggestion is correct.
From India, Salem
krishna@kk
Sir, He is a workmen as per ID act. How can labour inspector close the case without a single hearing now he is saying that pl hire a advocate I can not do anything. Pl suggest on the same.
From India, New Delhi
umakanthan53
5967

If your contention is that affected individual is a workman under the ID Act,1947, he can raise dispute u/s 2-A (I) of the ID Act,1947 before the area conciliation officer (L.O or A.L.C as the case may be ) in which proceedings the appearance of lawyer is prohibited. On receipt of the C.O's failure report or after the expiry of 45 days whichever is earlier, he can file a dispute u/s 2-A (ii) before the Labor Court.
From India, Salem
Find answers from people who have previously dealt with business and work issues similar to yours - Please Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query.




About Us Advertise Contact Us Testimonials
Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2024 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.