Dear friends,
Just seeking your advice, i am working with a company since last one year and now am going to leave that organization, tendering a notice period of approx. one month out of three month (i.e. only for employee not for employer as mentioned in appointment letter). Am facing a big problem of getting all the committed dues from the employer e.g. performance variable pay for a year (which is a huge amount of my total salary for me), at the time of offer and appointment the employer committed to give the benefit on monthly and quarterly basis but till date they fails to complete it and there is another deduction of monthly bonus from my pay structure, which was also committed to give on year end.
But now they are totally refuse to pay and replied if you are still with the company then we’ll pay you all. Now how I can believe them..! that they pay all these because for last one year they didn’t pay single penny to any employee.
Apart from that there are few cases come to my knowledge that they pay all the benefits to few employees who left the organization at senior level or to whom they terminate without serving notice period.
I had all the proof with me i.e. Appointment Letter where all the above two things are clearly mentioned in my pay structure with company’s seal and authorized signatory signature in original.
Please suggest how i can get it from the employer, or should i go for any labour complain to get benefit.
Thanking you
From India, New Delhi
1Just seeking your advice, i am working with a company since last one year and now am going to leave that organization, tendering a notice period of approx. one month out of three month (i.e. only for employee not for employer as mentioned in appointment letter). Am facing a big problem of getting all the committed dues from the employer e.g. performance variable pay for a year (which is a huge amount of my total salary for me), at the time of offer and appointment the employer committed to give the benefit on monthly and quarterly basis but till date they fails to complete it and there is another deduction of monthly bonus from my pay structure, which was also committed to give on year end.
But now they are totally refuse to pay and replied if you are still with the company then we’ll pay you all. Now how I can believe them..! that they pay all these because for last one year they didn’t pay single penny to any employee.
Apart from that there are few cases come to my knowledge that they pay all the benefits to few employees who left the organization at senior level or to whom they terminate without serving notice period.
I had all the proof with me i.e. Appointment Letter where all the above two things are clearly mentioned in my pay structure with company’s seal and authorized signatory signature in original.
Please suggest how i can get it from the employer, or should i go for any labour complain to get benefit.
Thanking you
From India, New Delhi
Salary is your fundamental right as per article 300 of the constitution.
Any promise made in the advertisement or appointment order has to be fulfilled. There can not be any precondition to it.
I am giving you a few quotes from the courts. May be useful to you.
Because, the Supreme Court in the case of M.D., T. Nadu Magnesite Ltd. Vs. S. Manickam and Ors. LegalCrystal Citation : legalcrystal.com/842317 Reported in : JT2010(3)SC328 held
11. The doctrine of promissory estoppels or equitable estoppels is well established in the administrative law of the country. To put it simply, the doctrine represents a principle evolved by equity to avoid injustice. The basis of the doctrine is that where any party has by his word or conduct made to the other party an unequivocal promise or representation by word or conduct, which is intended to create legal relations or effect a legal relationship to arise in the future, knowing as well as intending that the representation, assurance or the promise would be acted upon by the other party to whom it has been made and has in fact been so acted upon by the other party, the promise, assurance or representation should be binding on the party making it and that party should not be permitted to go back upon it, if it would be inequitable to allow him to do so, having regard to the dealings, which have taken place or are intended to take place between the parties.
The above case proves that a promise made in the appointment order can not be violated, which is detrimental to one party.
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission Director-General Of ... vs Sahara India Saving And ... on 6 September, 1989 Equivalent citations: 1990 68 CompCas 153 NULL Bench: G Luthra, H Gupta
The Supreme Court in Lakhanpal National Ltd. v. MRTPC [1989] 66 Comp Cas 519 as well as while dealing with the interpretation of the definition of unfair trade practice as given in Section 36A of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act made the following observations (page 524 of 66 Comp Cas) : ''Does it lead a reasonable person in the position of a buyer to a wrong conclusion ?..... It is, therefore, necessary to examine whether the representation complained of contains an element of misleading the buyer. Does a reasonable man on reading the advertisement form a belief different from what the truth is ?" (emphasis supplied)
When a CTC was promised, it is a simple expectation that on joining one will get the CTC advertised. The CTC is cost to company which must be incurred by the company as it is an irrevocable promise made. No reason can be invented to avoid the cost.
Punjab-Haryana High Court in Punjab State Civil Supplies ... vs Pyare Lal on 9 November, 2012 Letters Patent Appeal No.113 of 2012 http://indiankanoon.org/doc/161767981/ (by 3 judge bench - in para 10) has held
The salary is a property given to the hands of the State which cannot be withheld except under the powers derived by a statute or law as contemplated under Article 300A of the Constitution of India as laid down by the Supreme Court in MANU/SC/0046/1988: AIR1988SC1407 [State of U.P. v. Haji Ismail Noor] and MANU/SC/0325/2003: [2003]3SCR779 [K.S.R.T.C. v. K.O. Varghese].
The above case makes it clear that Salary promised can not be denied as it is the property of the employee.
From India, Salem
Any promise made in the advertisement or appointment order has to be fulfilled. There can not be any precondition to it.
I am giving you a few quotes from the courts. May be useful to you.
Because, the Supreme Court in the case of M.D., T. Nadu Magnesite Ltd. Vs. S. Manickam and Ors. LegalCrystal Citation : legalcrystal.com/842317 Reported in : JT2010(3)SC328 held
11. The doctrine of promissory estoppels or equitable estoppels is well established in the administrative law of the country. To put it simply, the doctrine represents a principle evolved by equity to avoid injustice. The basis of the doctrine is that where any party has by his word or conduct made to the other party an unequivocal promise or representation by word or conduct, which is intended to create legal relations or effect a legal relationship to arise in the future, knowing as well as intending that the representation, assurance or the promise would be acted upon by the other party to whom it has been made and has in fact been so acted upon by the other party, the promise, assurance or representation should be binding on the party making it and that party should not be permitted to go back upon it, if it would be inequitable to allow him to do so, having regard to the dealings, which have taken place or are intended to take place between the parties.
The above case proves that a promise made in the appointment order can not be violated, which is detrimental to one party.
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission Director-General Of ... vs Sahara India Saving And ... on 6 September, 1989 Equivalent citations: 1990 68 CompCas 153 NULL Bench: G Luthra, H Gupta
The Supreme Court in Lakhanpal National Ltd. v. MRTPC [1989] 66 Comp Cas 519 as well as while dealing with the interpretation of the definition of unfair trade practice as given in Section 36A of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act made the following observations (page 524 of 66 Comp Cas) : ''Does it lead a reasonable person in the position of a buyer to a wrong conclusion ?..... It is, therefore, necessary to examine whether the representation complained of contains an element of misleading the buyer. Does a reasonable man on reading the advertisement form a belief different from what the truth is ?" (emphasis supplied)
When a CTC was promised, it is a simple expectation that on joining one will get the CTC advertised. The CTC is cost to company which must be incurred by the company as it is an irrevocable promise made. No reason can be invented to avoid the cost.
Punjab-Haryana High Court in Punjab State Civil Supplies ... vs Pyare Lal on 9 November, 2012 Letters Patent Appeal No.113 of 2012 http://indiankanoon.org/doc/161767981/ (by 3 judge bench - in para 10) has held
The salary is a property given to the hands of the State which cannot be withheld except under the powers derived by a statute or law as contemplated under Article 300A of the Constitution of India as laid down by the Supreme Court in MANU/SC/0046/1988: AIR1988SC1407 [State of U.P. v. Haji Ismail Noor] and MANU/SC/0325/2003: [2003]3SCR779 [K.S.R.T.C. v. K.O. Varghese].
The above case makes it clear that Salary promised can not be denied as it is the property of the employee.
From India, Salem
Article 300 has nothing to do with fundamental rights or salary.
It allows the government to be sued in the courts in spite of sovereign rights.
I do not know the context in which it will become applicable in solving the problem of the poster.
From India, Mumbai
It allows the government to be sued in the courts in spite of sovereign rights.
I do not know the context in which it will become applicable in solving the problem of the poster.
From India, Mumbai
I think you are confusing the concept of CTC with your gross salary.
The concept of variable pay also varies from company to company, so it would be better if you shared your appointment letter so people know the exact clause
Mostly, variable pay is at the discretion of the employer.
So you dont get it if the company decided it does not want to give you
(again the exact wording of your appointment letter will make a difference)
Bonus is not being deducted from your salary, its a part of your CTC. Again, i guess unless your salary is less than Rs. 21,000 per month, bonus is at option of the company.
From India, Mumbai
The concept of variable pay also varies from company to company, so it would be better if you shared your appointment letter so people know the exact clause
Mostly, variable pay is at the discretion of the employer.
So you dont get it if the company decided it does not want to give you
(again the exact wording of your appointment letter will make a difference)
Bonus is not being deducted from your salary, its a part of your CTC. Again, i guess unless your salary is less than Rs. 21,000 per month, bonus is at option of the company.
From India, Mumbai
Find answers from people who have previously dealt with business and work issues similar to yours - Please Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query.
Maternity Benefit is not Salary.docx
Creche under Maternity Benefit Act.pdf