Hello Friends
In need your valuable advice for my below querry.
During suspension pending enquiry proceeding, can the delinquent employee (petitioner) appoint a lawyer to conduct the disciplinary proceedings on behalf of him.
Pls provide be sufficient court orders also which adduce the authority authorising him to engage lawyer.
Thanks
Sreedevi
From India, Thiruvananthapuram
1In need your valuable advice for my below querry.
During suspension pending enquiry proceeding, can the delinquent employee (petitioner) appoint a lawyer to conduct the disciplinary proceedings on behalf of him.
Pls provide be sufficient court orders also which adduce the authority authorising him to engage lawyer.
Thanks
Sreedevi
From India, Thiruvananthapuram
The purpose of conducting domestic inquiry is to allow or offer sufficient opportunity to the delinquent employee who is charged with a misconduct. Normally an ordinary employee is not well aware with the procedure and practice followed in the Inquiry. Also he may not have skill to put cross-questions to management's witness and thus defend his case. Hence, assistance of a co-worker or of a union representative has been permitted by making a specific provisions in the Model Standing Orders.
In case, when management is represented in Inquiry by a skilled, experienced and trained person in law or by a lawyer, denial of assistance of an Advocate is not advisable. So also, the charges are complicated and any ordinary man cannot easily understand them, legal assistance should be allowed to be taken by the employee.
The provisions of Model Standing Orders of Maharashtra State are to be read liberally and not strictly.
From India, Kolhapur
In case, when management is represented in Inquiry by a skilled, experienced and trained person in law or by a lawyer, denial of assistance of an Advocate is not advisable. So also, the charges are complicated and any ordinary man cannot easily understand them, legal assistance should be allowed to be taken by the employee.
The provisions of Model Standing Orders of Maharashtra State are to be read liberally and not strictly.
From India, Kolhapur
It is the general practice, an employee along with the Advocate is allowed, but Advocate alone dealing with the matters in the absence of an employee is not acceptable (unless the employee is physically or mentally not in a position to attend and deal by himself...), with the presence of an employee, Advocate cab deal with the matters, enquiry, inquiry, any related procedure for that matter completely........
From India, Bangalore
From India, Bangalore
Dear Sreedevi,
In the normal course for a domestic enquiry, engagement of a lawyer by the delinquent employee is not allowed, unless the Rules for conduct of such enquiry permit it.
I am attaching two judgements in this regard.
(i) A Supreme Court Judgement in Management of National Seeds Corporation v. K V Rama Reddy and
(ii) A Judgement by the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court in V Mathivanan v. State Bank of India.
I have taken the liberty of highlighting a couple of paragraphs in the Supreme Court Judgement. Please note that this highlighting is not a part of the judgement itself.
I trust you would find these helpful in arriving at a decision in regard to engaging a lawyer.
Regards
Raju Bhatnagar
From India, Bangalore
In the normal course for a domestic enquiry, engagement of a lawyer by the delinquent employee is not allowed, unless the Rules for conduct of such enquiry permit it.
I am attaching two judgements in this regard.
(i) A Supreme Court Judgement in Management of National Seeds Corporation v. K V Rama Reddy and
(ii) A Judgement by the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court in V Mathivanan v. State Bank of India.
I have taken the liberty of highlighting a couple of paragraphs in the Supreme Court Judgement. Please note that this highlighting is not a part of the judgement itself.
I trust you would find these helpful in arriving at a decision in regard to engaging a lawyer.
Regards
Raju Bhatnagar
From India, Bangalore
If the rules permits or if the management is represented by an advocate then rhe employee is entitled to be represented by an advocate.This is the general rule.But there are court ruling holding that if the charges are very complicated to defend then an advocate can be allowed for compliance of natural justice.
If your establishment is in Kerala follow only model standing orders under Kerala SO rules.
Varghese Mathew
9961266966
From India, Thiruvananthapuram
If your establishment is in Kerala follow only model standing orders under Kerala SO rules.
Varghese Mathew
9961266966
From India, Thiruvananthapuram
Dear friends,
My opinion is that more than anything, the provisions of SO/Conduct & Disciplinary Rules which governs them have a say in the matter as other citation can apply to the specific cases relevant rather than suo-motto apply to all the cases. This is because every case will have certain specifics and different than the other. Surprisingly there are different judgements passed by various courts as you could see from the attached citations, there are some far and some against, this is just because circumstances differs. So one has to approach based on the merits of each case.
http://police.pondicherry.gov.in/pol...ASE%20LAWS.pdf.
I'm sure this would provide interesting reading to our friends who seeks such things.
From India, Bangalore
My opinion is that more than anything, the provisions of SO/Conduct & Disciplinary Rules which governs them have a say in the matter as other citation can apply to the specific cases relevant rather than suo-motto apply to all the cases. This is because every case will have certain specifics and different than the other. Surprisingly there are different judgements passed by various courts as you could see from the attached citations, there are some far and some against, this is just because circumstances differs. So one has to approach based on the merits of each case.
http://police.pondicherry.gov.in/pol...ASE%20LAWS.pdf.
I'm sure this would provide interesting reading to our friends who seeks such things.
From India, Bangalore
------------------
Dear friends,
It's generally accepted privilege to a charged employee to represent himself by a Union rep. Supposing the very same Union rep.happened to be a Law graduate, if not a practising Advocate being an employee or a non-employee but part of the Union then how the Lawyer could be denied to represent the charged/accused employee. I came across many union office bearers who are not an employee per se, but prominent politicians, practising advocates, prominent labour leaders some times retired employees etc., still can take part in such disputes and enquiries, they also can sign settlements, agreements on behalf of the Union/employees like wage settlements, conciliations etc. Then how they can be denied either assisting or participating in the enquiry? Some member Advocates in practice might like to contribute with their experiences.
From India, Bangalore
Dear friends,
It's generally accepted privilege to a charged employee to represent himself by a Union rep. Supposing the very same Union rep.happened to be a Law graduate, if not a practising Advocate being an employee or a non-employee but part of the Union then how the Lawyer could be denied to represent the charged/accused employee. I came across many union office bearers who are not an employee per se, but prominent politicians, practising advocates, prominent labour leaders some times retired employees etc., still can take part in such disputes and enquiries, they also can sign settlements, agreements on behalf of the Union/employees like wage settlements, conciliations etc. Then how they can be denied either assisting or participating in the enquiry? Some member Advocates in practice might like to contribute with their experiences.
From India, Bangalore
Dear all, The judicial dictum is well settled that assistance of an advocate cannot be allowed unless the circumstances pointed out in the comments of Shri Varghese Mathew & Raju Bhatnagar are met. If advocates are to be allowed at free will, then it will no longer be departmental enquiries and will be no different than any court proceeding. So the assistance of Advocate is not by default and is to be allowed only where the Presenting officer is a trained legal mind, (like practising advocate or a prosecutor from Police Establishment) and where the facts are too complicated and carries legal issues which have not been settled so far by the higher courts.KK
From India, Bhopal
From India, Bhopal
One final point in this matter.If any of the members are preparing standing orders make it in such a way that only a coworker can be allowed to assist the delinquent employee,and not an advocate or TU leaders.Co worker may be a TU executive. But it is less of consequence than an external leader who in most cases will be an advocate or a politician who will complicate the enquiry.The existing SOs can also be amended along these lines.
Varghese Mathew
Labour law Adviser
09961266966
From India, Thiruvananthapuram
Varghese Mathew
Labour law Adviser
09961266966
From India, Thiruvananthapuram
Find answers from people who have previously dealt with business and work issues similar to yours - Please Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query.
Employee Appraisal Form new.doc