Warning: preg_replace(): Empty regular expression in [path]/showthread.php on line 2381

Warning: preg_replace(): Empty regular expression in [path]/showthread.php on line 2381

Warning: preg_replace(): Empty regular expression in [path]/showthread.php on line 2381
Status Of Contract Labour - Supreme Court Divided - CiteHR

No Tags Found!

SH

Shai89308

Executive Hr

AS

Ammu Shanvi

Human Resource

GS

G SHASHI KRISHNA

Senior Manager - Hr

AH

Aizant HR

Human Resources

MA

MARSHAL

Safety Officer

AK

Anish Katoch

Hr Executive

PR

PranjalR

Hr Recruiter

AP

Alka Pal

Hr Executive

Karthikeyan8195

Management Consultant

MK

Mohit Kumar Puri

Head Marketing

AU

Austex

Accounts Manager


pca
1442

The status of contract labour in commercial establishments continues to divide the judges. Last week, two judges in a division bench of the Supreme Court hearing the appeals of workers in the Hotel Corporation of India, which runs the canteen facilities for Air India, differed on their entitlements. The grievance of the workers was that they were employed by Air India, but they were not regularised by keeping them temporary for long periods by devious means. They argued that they were working with Chef Air, a unit of the government- owned Hotel Corporation, which in turn was a subsidiary of Air India. They raised an industrial dispute and the tribunal held that they were deemed employees of Air India and their real status was “ camouflaged” by

corporate veils. Air India moved the Delhi High Court against the tribunal’s verdict. Both the single judge bench and the division bench of the high court gave findings in favour of the national carrier. The employees carried the dispute to the Supreme Court in the appeal, Balwant Rai vs Air India. The judges again differed on the status of the workers. One judge held that the workers of Chef Air cannot claim to be employed by Air India and dismissed the appeal. On the other hand, another judge restored the order of the tribunal and ordered Air India to reinstate them with consequential benefits like back wages. Since the judges have given contrary orders in their separate 150- page judgment, the issue will have to be decided by a larger bench, or it may even go to a constitution bench.

Source:

Business Standard

From India, Malappuram
Attached Files (Download Requires Membership)
File Type: pdf SC divided on status of contract labour 13.11.2013.pdf (560.6 KB, 130 views)

Find answers from people who have previously dealt with business and work issues similar to yours - Please Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query.




About Us Advertise Contact Us Testimonials
Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2025 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.