No Tags Found!

SH

Shai89308

Executive Hr

AS

Ammu Shanvi

Human Resource

GS

G SHASHI KRISHNA

Senior Manager - Hr

AH

Aizant HR

Human Resources

MA

MARSHAL

Safety Officer

AK

Anish Katoch

Hr Executive

PR

PranjalR

Hr Recruiter

AP

Alka Pal

Hr Executive

Karthikeyan8195

Management Consultant

MK

Mohit Kumar Puri

Head Marketing

AU

Austex

Accounts Manager


raghuvaran chakkaravarthy
495

Safety Team,
Sharing as Received.
Enclosed is a near miss abstract that involves lock out/tag out (LOTO) operation. Many workers had the impression that LOTO only applies to electrical system. On the contrary, it applies to stored energy (e.g., gravity, steam, compressed air, hydraulics, utilities, etc.). Please share the enclosure and its lessons learned to your team.
Also attache the two more Lesson learned pdf file for your use.

From United States, Fpo
Attached Files (Download Requires Membership)
File Type: pdf Near Miss Notice - (Mechanical) Energy Safety - 13 - 02 - 25.pdf (137.2 KB, 852 views)
File Type: pdf AWP- NEAR MISS.pdf (198.6 KB, 591 views)
File Type: pdf Fatal Contractor Mishap Notice - Tipped Elevated Manlift.pdf (440.1 KB, 585 views)

dipil
711

Dear Raghu
Thanks for sharing..
The first two attachments, I would like to call it as an Unsafe Condition Reporting, rather than Near Miss...
Are you agreeing to me, if not how we can fit these two under Near Miss...

From India
raghuvaran chakkaravarthy
495

Dear Dipil,
Good Question I’m agree with you, but, let me give an example if bolt falls from top of floor/somewhere but nobody can’t get hurt ‘’What we called this?’’ am sure we called ‘’NEARMISS’’ . If we analyses this scenario in depth how bolt falls from floor/somewhere surely we find/get the root cause. Most of time we supposed to get the reason was unsafe act or unsafe condition.
Unsafe act or unsafe condition only leads to Near miss (EXCEPT very few rare cases), most of time its cause accident. My understanding was NEARMISS will not happen without unsafe act or unsafe condition.
Waiting for your view on this matter.

From United States, Fpo
dipil
711

Dear Raghu
Thanks for the inputs.
In the incident case scenario which you explained, after the incident happened it is called Near Miss and before the incident happened it is unsafe act or man made unsafe condition...
Companies even following two schemes.. One is called Near Miss Reporting and another is Unsafe Condition & Potential Unsafe Act Reporting... So both have it's own significance and have to dealt separately... It's changing from Industry to Industry, company to company... Whatever may be, the ultimate aim should be incident prevention... That's it...

From India
Find answers from people who have previously dealt with business and work issues similar to yours - Please Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query.




About Us Advertise Contact Us Testimonials
Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2025 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.