Dear collegue,
I am in dilemma, if the dispute took place between staff member, the ID act defines only workmen, there is not any kind of provisin for staff member and factroy act defines, the plant head can be called as a workmen.
From India, Nagpur
I am in dilemma, if the dispute took place between staff member, the ID act defines only workmen, there is not any kind of provisin for staff member and factroy act defines, the plant head can be called as a workmen.
From India, Nagpur
An employee having substantial authority over his subordinates by way of approving leave, initiating disciplinary action or carrying out performance appraisal is the one who is out of coverage of ID Act. All others will come within the purview of ID Act. Therefore, if a staff (employee) is not in supervisory or managerial capacity not by designation but by virtue of his above mentioned authorities, he can refer his dispute under ID Act.
Regards,
Madhu.T.K
From India, Kannur
3891Regards,
Madhu.T.K
From India, Kannur
Hi every supervisory staff not covered under the workman whose wages are more than 6500.00 P/M under the ID Act . Regards
From India, Velluru
From India, Velluru
Wages for Workmen under ID had been hiked to Rs.10,000 from 1,600 P.M
For those not covered under ID act, company rules for employees will be applicable and disiciplinary action can be taken based on it.
From India, Tiruchchirappalli
For those not covered under ID act, company rules for employees will be applicable and disiciplinary action can be taken based on it.
From India, Tiruchchirappalli
Find answers from people who have previously dealt with business and work issues similar to yours - Please Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query.
Annexure A _Factory's Act does not Apply to Construction Sites -Workers.pdf
Amendment to Payment of Bonus Act 2015.jpg