Hi friendsI would feel enlightened if i may be supplied the copy of the Judgment of Kerela High Court reported as 2003 (1) LLN 692 in the case of K.V. Joseph Versus Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Eranakulam. Bye.Puneet Gupta
From India, Ludhiana
10From India, Ludhiana
Many many mannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnny thanks for posting the relavent judgement.It will be for the benefit of many if judgement in O.P.No.1149/1991 is also posted.
Iny other Judgement similar to the above of any High court and/or (preferably) Honble Supreme Court?If so these may also referred.
Regards
From India, Jaipur
Iny other Judgement similar to the above of any High court and/or (preferably) Honble Supreme Court?If so these may also referred.
Regards
From India, Jaipur
Refer note above,it will be for the benefit of many if judgement in O.P.No.1149/1991 is also posted.
Iny other Judgement similar to the above of any High court and/or (preferably) Honble Supreme Court?If so these may also referred.
Regards
From India, Jaipur
Iny other Judgement similar to the above of any High court and/or (preferably) Honble Supreme Court?If so these may also referred.
Regards
From India, Jaipur
Hello,
I have an factory which was under liquadation since 2001. Recently(2008) the company has come out of liquadation under the Mumbai High court's orders.
However, now in April 2009 we have received an demand notice from the ESIC under sec 14(b) to pay interest on delayed payment and damages thereof (period 1991 - 2001)
Failure to do this will attract action as under sec 14(B).
Further facts in our case are that our Bank had gone into DRT for recovery proceedings. and subsequently sold the assets to Arcil. Arcil is in process of selling the factory premises under SARFASI Act to a third party where we have provided no objection.
So my querry is
Regs
Rahul
From India, Bangalore
I have an factory which was under liquadation since 2001. Recently(2008) the company has come out of liquadation under the Mumbai High court's orders.
However, now in April 2009 we have received an demand notice from the ESIC under sec 14(b) to pay interest on delayed payment and damages thereof (period 1991 - 2001)
Failure to do this will attract action as under sec 14(B).
Further facts in our case are that our Bank had gone into DRT for recovery proceedings. and subsequently sold the assets to Arcil. Arcil is in process of selling the factory premises under SARFASI Act to a third party where we have provided no objection.
So my querry is
- Are we liable to pay to this demand notice.
- in case we ignore this notice what action is possible against us under this section 14 (b)
- will the new owners of the premises (not the company though) will be liable to pay.
Regs
Rahul
From India, Bangalore
Find answers from people who have previously dealt with business and work issues similar to yours - Please Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query.
EPF Act.ppt