No Tags Found!

SH

Shai89308

Executive Hr

AS

Ammu Shanvi

Human Resource

GS

G SHASHI KRISHNA

Senior Manager - Hr

AH

Aizant HR

Human Resources

MA

MARSHAL

Safety Officer

AK

Anish Katoch

Hr Executive

PR

PranjalR

Hr Recruiter

AP

Alka Pal

Hr Executive

Karthikeyan8195

Management Consultant

MK

Mohit Kumar Puri

Head Marketing

AU

Austex

Accounts Manager


DrDineshahuja
I would like to share a problem with you and need your expert opinion
As of
1. Team of sso visited and prepared a false and fabricated report and without any authority letter got signed by marketing Person
2.is esi act applicable on hospitals
3. Already submitted reply as please do calculations as per balance sheet but got c18actual for directly engaged employees
C18 adhoc for a contracter who's entry was shown in survey
That contracter has given opp to show there record they also denied
4. Now again they are demanding money
What Should I do and what not to do
At present one more chance is given for file reply
Please help

From India, Delhi
Glidor
628

if contractor worker is engaged by the establishment, then they have to ensure their their ESIC /EPF/Profession Tax liability is paid by the contractor, before clearance of their bills, if the contractor is is not maintaining the procedure then the principal employer stand liable for the same.
get in touch with an consultant nearby, he will examine the issue and will submit suitable reply


Apex Management
156

Dear Ahuja ji
I take this opportunity to comment on your each and every query to the best of my knowledge as under:-
1. It is difficult to prove the report of SSO team who prepared and might have obtained certain documents duly stamped and signs as false and fabricated even after labeling corruption charges.
2. Yes, ESIC is applicable to Hospitals as well.
3. Before, issuing C18, adhoc / actual the ESIC Regional office must have exercised applicable remedies and in the absence of compliance or proper reply from your side, they seems to have proceeded further. It is also bought to your notice, that C18 ad hoc can not be reviewed for actual unless have proper reasons and even deposition of certain amount out of the demand.
3. As stated above, after issuing C18, your reply may not have been considered. Same is the case of your contractor.
4. Without going through the compliance and relevant documents, one cannot comment as to what to do.
P K Sharma 9816033142

From India, Delhi
Harsh Kumar Mehta
921

1. Sir, in addition to the remarks of Sh. P.K.Sharma ji as above, I may submit that the process of action of assessment of contribution under section 45A of ESI Act, 1948 is a time-bound process and in addition, the initiator of thread is also not clear about the compliance of the contractor employees. Therefore, it is difficult to offer any comments in this case.
2. The findings and recommendations of Preliminary Inspection Report/ Inspection Report of any Social Security Officer is generally accepted by ESIC so far as coverage of an unit is concerned. Such Reports can be challenged ( if there are valid reasons for such challenge) only in Employees' Insurance Court, locally established. Therefore, I will suggest to the initiator of this thread to contact an experienced advocate who is attending cases locally in designated EI Court and challenge the decision/demands of ESIC, their reports etc.etc., if otherwise found suitable on merit.

From India, Noida
kishorkulkarni
241

Not all states have extended coverage to "Educational and Medical Institutions under ESIC... ".
Some States like TN and Kerala have done so, as such, situation may differ from State to State.
Therefore, it will be necessary to find out whether Hospitals are included in the notification by the State under section 1(5) of ESI Act.

From India, Kolhapur
Harsh Kumar Mehta
921

Sir, the appropriate government had already extended the provisions of said Act under section 1(5) vide notification dated 23/3/2011 w.e.f. 01/04/2011 in National Capital Territory, Delhi to medical institutions (including corporate, joint sector, trust, charitable and private ownership hospitals, nursing homes, diagnostic centres, pathological labs).
From India, Noida
azim_1607@yahoo.com
16

Dear Dr Dinesh Ahuja,
Kindly refer the circulars ( Inspection Policy ) under ESI issued by Insurance Commissioner, HO Dated 1.08.2014 / 25.08.2014 / 18.06.2015. make representation to the above authority.
Kindly convey to the forum about the outcome.
Regards.

From India, Mumbai
Find answers from people who have previously dealt with business and work issues similar to yours - Please Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query.




About Us Advertise Contact Us Testimonials
Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2025 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.